Showing posts with label United Church. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United Church. Show all posts

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Where Does God's Love and Power End?

Where does God's love and power end? Does it end with a certain leader? Does it stop before it gets to people who do not share our politics? Are people who don't worship like I do or believe what I do beyond the pale ... beyond God's power and love?

I ask these questions because I fear there are many people in church and other faith groups today who believe that there are such limits to God's love and power.

I remember being approached by a lady in my former parish who was extremely challenged by the thoughts I expressed in my sermons and in discussions. For example, in a discussion with her I said I wouldn't be surprised to meet a Buddhist in heaven. She was apparently very shocked by this and wrote to the Bishop complaining that as a Christian minister I should not have express such a thought. She also was upset that in my sermons I expressed my belief in God's love and acceptance of homosexuals. She went so far as to tell the Bishop that I had been ordered by the Vestry not to express such thoughts about homosexuality in my sermons any more. She finally said that she had never heard me preach the Good News of Jesus Christ.

This certainly gave me a great deal to reflect on and pray about. I certainly hope the individual sitting just beside this lady in church and whose spouse was Buddhist heard the good news in my message. I also hope that the gay couple who recently joined the church was able to find the good news in the message I believe God gave me for that day.

I wonder if two people can hear the Gospel message differently as they did in our Lord’s day. Is it possible for one person to hear the Good News and for another to find it threatening because it calls upon them to change some behaviour or attitude? Could it be that this lady felt uncomfortable because some core part of my message had called upon her to realize that her views were not necessarily God’s views?

Sadly, I don't think this lady with her dislike of my theology and beliefs about God sits alone in our faith groups. I fear there are many others out there in our faith communities who believe it is their duty to express an opinion about who God can love and how God can love.

My prayer is that one day this lady, a preci0us child of God will discover the true Good News of God, that the Creator loves recklessly and generously. God's love even extends to her and to me as we are all children of the Holy One.

*******

Jesus, who has been sitting next to you as you read this now turns to you and asks: “What do you think? How will you respond?

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

The State of Our Canadian Clergy

March 13, 2007

The findings of a new study, Clergy Well-Being: Seeking
Wholeness with Integrity, have been released. The author of
the study is the Rev. Andrew R. Irvine, PhD., of the Centre
for Clergy Care & Congregational Health, established by the
United Church’s Emmanuel College and the Presbyterian
Church’s Knox College, for the purpose of supporting clergy
well-being and congregational health.

In conducting the research,
Dr. Irvine interviewed clergy from six major protestant
denominations in Ontario: United, Anglican, Presbyterian,
Evangelical Lutheran, Baptist Convention and Pentecostal
Assemblies. The entire study is available at
www.utoronto.ca/caringforclergy/research.html.

In his report, Dr. Irvine wrote, “As human beings we come
to the fullness of “self through the social relationships and our
interaction within community and the world. It is therefore
paramount that relationships and social activity be a central
part of our activity and development….Relationships for
clergy have always been a matter of great concern….Ministers
are surrounded by many people within the congregation and
community, but they are often defined by the strong definition
of office as opposed to by which they are as persons….
ministers are the one career group who could never
step outside of their professional definition and identity.”

Here are some of the study’s highlights:

 Nearly 49 % of clergy could claim having two or less friends; 18 % identified no one as a friend in their current
church or community. “Relationally, [ministers] felt unfilled and lonely,” Irvine noted. Reasons for lack of friends
included: busyness, confidentiality and the transitory nature of ministry.
 55 % indicated they sometimes feel very lonely.
 16 % have a spiritual director.
 70 % moderately or strongly disagreed with the statement: I feel fulfilled in ministry.
 67 % agreed to strongly agreed with the statement: I sometimes project my job frustration on the family.
 80 % agreed to strongly agreed with the statement: I feel guilty if people see me taking time off during the
week.
 4 % have gone to denominational staff for support in a crisis.
 51 % indicated they have suffered physically from stress-induced problems.
 20 % have been diagnosed with emotional conditions, 16 % with depression – double Health Canada’s findings
that 8 % of Canadian adults experience major depression in their lives. Twice as many female clergy than male
clergy become depressed.
 50 % moderately to strongly disagreed with the statement: I am consistent between who I am and how I appear
to others.
 80 % of ministers admitted varying degrees of jealously toward the success of other ministers. This attributes to
a high level of competition amongst clergy. “Meaningful friendships cannot be established or maintained on a
foundation of mistrust and competition,” Irvine stated.
 77 % agreed to strongly agreed with the statement: I feel more like a CEO than a pastor.
 83 % agreed with the statement: My church wants a CEO rather than a pastor.
 91 % agreed with the statement: Being a ‘minister’ is more like a job than a calling.
 86 % agreed to strongly agreed with the statement: I pray with others but rarely have time for personal prayer.
 60 % have considered leaving ministry.
Together, we can change the conditions of ministry for the better.

Sunday, March 11, 2007

The Anglican Double Standard

Urgent Action Required – Let Your Voice be Heard

The Rev. Shawn Sanford Beck, Director of the Saskatoon Native Ministry is about to have his license removed by the Anglican Bishop of Saskatoon the Rt. Rev. Rodney Andrews. According to the Anglican Church Web News, this action was taken after Rev. Beck announced that he would marry gay couples. According to the report Bishop Andrews said that this was not a disciplinary action. It should be noted that an unlicensed priest is unable to perform baptisms or celebrate communion.

Our question then is how is Rev. Beck to earn a living as a priest.

Note the double standard being applied here. When Archbishop Finlay officiated at a gay wedding only his license to perform marriages was suspended and just for 3 months. Recently he served as chaplain to the Canadian House of Bishops Meeting. To our knowledge Rev. Beck has only said he will perform gay marriages and has lost his license as a priest.

The Rocky Mountain Center for Progressive Faith and Works Ltd. Commends Rev. Beck for standing up for his faith beliefs. We can all learn from Rev. Beck’s courage and faith in action.

Show your support for Rev. Beck by contacting him before March 31, 2007 at :

Saskatoon Native Ministry,
808 – 20th Street,
Saskatoon, SK S7M 0Y3
244-1381
snm@sasktel.net

Please also consider supporting the Rocky Mountain Center for Progressive Faith and Works Ltd. As we seek to develop a resource center for clergy who are being treated unjustly. See the article about this program on this web page.

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Help for Religious Leaders

Help Us Support Clergy Who Have Been Mistreated or Denied Justice
The Rocky Mountain Center for Progressive Faith and Works Ltd is in the process of developing a Canada wide resource base to assist religious leaders of all faith groups who have been abused, denied natural justice, bullied, or denied fair access to the internal justice structures of faith groups.
We invite lay and ordained members of all faith to communities to help us in developing these resources by:
  • sending us copies of faith group laws, rules and structures which you consider to be unjust, abusive or discriminatory;
  • examples of progressive faith representatives whom you believe have been silenced by religious authorities;
  • encourage individuals who believe they have experienced first hand such unjust treatment to send us their stories and any supporting documentation;
  • provide us with the names, addresses and other contact of lawyers and legal firms who have had experience representing individuals who have experienced such injustice or have been treated unfairly and may be willing to do so again.
  • the contact information for other individuals and groups who are engaged in a similar work.

It is helpful if this information can be provided to us by email or in a pdf or doc format.

We can be contacted at:

The Rocky Mountain Center for Progressive Faith and Works Ltd.

Frank Doe, B.E.S., M.Div. Director

340 Hoodoo Crescent

Canmore, Alberta T1W 1A9

1-403-678-5503

faithtowork@yahoo.ca

Other Helpful Links:

Pastors in Pain: A web site to help Christian ministers in pain.

http://www.pastorsinpain.com/

Pastoral Advocacy Center:

http://www.gardenministries.com/pastoral_advocacy_center.htm

Bullied and Abused Lives in Ministry:

http://www.balmnet.co.uk/

Clergy Abuse Net

http://www.clergyabuse.net/resources.html

Rocky Mountain Center for Progressive Christian Faith and Works Ltd

Share your story and suggestions with us. Please let others know about our site.

http://centerforprogressivefaithandworks.blogspot.com/

CAW - United Church Clergy Initiative

www.caw.ca/unitedclergy

Sunday, March 4, 2007

Do You Know Where Your Charitable Donation Is and What it Has Been Doing?

Part One: Religious Charities in Canada

Let’s start with a question: “What is greater than the combined dollar amounts the Provinces of Saskatchewan, Manitoba and New Brunswick are spending on health care in the current fiscal year 2006 – 2007.”
Do you give up? Well here is the answer. The amount of money Canadians donated to charities back in 2004 (8.9 billion dollars) exceeds this year’s combined health care budgets for Saskatchewan, Manitoba and New Brunswick (8.7 billion dollars) by about 200 million dollars. This revelation about the generosity of Canadians was made in the report Caring Canadians, Involved Canadians; Highlights from 2004Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering and participating published by the Ministry of Industry in 2006.
Surely few of us would say that the 8.7 billion spent on health care in these three provinces is an insignificant amount. I suspect that even fewer of us would argue that we need to eliminate checks in the system to ensure that the money is well spent. Most of us I suspect would want to make certain that we obtained the biggest bang for our buck. That is why we have auditors, accounts committees and opposition parties that oversee public spending, all in an attempt to make sure that the resources we provide are well spent.
But what about the money we donate to charities? In 2004 that amounted to 8.9 billion dollars in Canada. Can we honestly say that we know for certain that all of that money is being well and properly spent? Or do we just assume that everything is okay; that someone else is looking after it. Andrew Carnegie is reported to have once said: “It is more difficult to give money away intelligently than it is to earn it in the first place.”
And what would you say if I told you that the lion’s share of the money given in 2004 went to religious charities. In fact the report put out by the Ministry of Industry clearly states that a staggering 45% of the 8.9 billion charity dollars given in 2004 went to religious organizations, while only 10% went to social service organizations.
Charities and this includes many if not all religious institutions, benefit not just from the generosity of their own donors but also from the Canadian taxation system. Through the taxation system all Canadians whether or not they have a religious belief support donations to religious organizations in the form of missed taxation revenue which could otherwise have been directed to improved health care, education or reducing third world debt, to give but a few examples. Many I’m sure would therefore agree that whether or not we contribute to an individual charity we all as Canadians have a duty to make sure that our investments are being efficiently managed.

Religious Charities – Part Two: One Priest’s Perspective

After twenty two years in active parish ministry, I can honestly say that I have seen and learned a thing or two. I also want to share with you that seminary and a parish internship never came close to preparing me for the amount of time I would be called upon to spend on money related matters. Now when I talk about money matters, I don’t mean helping people who are down on their luck. Sadly the occasions to engage in that form of pastoral care were not as frequent as I once thought they would be. No the money matters I refer to are those required to keep the doors of the institutional church open and to support the multiple levels of ecclesiastical bureaucracy

Sadly the media have made us aware of all too many instances of financial malfeasance in the church. In the U.S. one school of business conducted a survey of one Christian denomination. Eighty-five per cent of the dioceses responding reported uncovering embezzlement schemes over the past five years. In November of 2002 the Toronto Star reported that almost one in six Canadian charities spent more money on fundraising and administration that they did on charitable work. It seems that no nation, no faith group, no denomination is immune from financial scandal which can be committed by ordained clergy and laity alike. Fortunately many of these crooks are eventually caught but often only after their dishonesty has done serious damage to the Gospel message. In addition, well-meaning but inefficient operations may go on undetected until a donor or a member of the public begins to ask truth probing questions and demanding accountability from all charities benefiting from their privileged position under the Canadian tax system.

Now I want to share with you some examples which I believe illustrate the importance of all of us asking questions of the charities to which we give money. The worst mistake we can make is to assume that someone else is making sure that the money we give is being used for the reason we gave it.

Example One

My first parish was a mission parish. For those of you not familiar with the term ‘mission parish’ it simply means that it could not afford to pay a full time minister on its own, it need help from other parishes. The people of this parish were a delight to work with. Everyone pitched in whenever something needed to be done. Volunteers cleaned the church. Even the mayor who was a member of the parish could be seen vacuuming or cleaning the toilets. Within one year this church became self supporting and paid off the mortgage on the minister’s house. Within 8 years they increased the amount they gave to help other parishes, ministries and the always present Diocesan bureaucracy five fold. The members of that parish could have kept some of that money and hired a janitor to do the cleaning but no, they continued to sweep and scrub in order to help others with the money they chose to give to help others. You can imagine then my surprise when as Regional Dean I visited another mission parish that was asking for financial assistance to pay part of their minister for the next year. When I met with their Board to go over their proposed budget including the assistance they were requesting I discovered that they were asking for money to continue to pay not just their minister but also the janitor they had had for a number of years. I told them that in all fairness to the people of my parish I could not support their request as it was when the people of my parish were cleaning their own house of worship in order to save money to give to help others. This extravagance would have continued if questions had not been asked. What do you think would have happened had the good natured and generous people of my parish would have thought had they discovered that this was how their donation was being used? Do you think some might have become discouraged and cut back on their giving’s thinking that their donations were being misused?

Example Two


Another parish I served was like the parish in the first example as it too had many wonderful, faithful, and dedicated members.

Church rules require every church looking for a new minister to write a parish profile which tells prospective new minister about the church and its members.
This profile is then vetted and approved by the diocesan bureaucracy which is in large part paid for by the local churches.

The profile developed by this parish and reviewed and approved by the diocesan bureaucracy painted a fairly rosy picture of its financial situation. In part the profile said:

That the parish considered “Ensuring Financial Soundness as demonstrated by meeting our ongoing operating costs annually from parish donations” an important goal.
That “God richly blesses” the parish. “For 2000 an annual budget of approximately $116,000 was approved. The budget for 2001 is being developed at present and will likely be in the $120,000 range. The major renovation and reconstruction projects during the 1990’s were started and supported through generous anonymous donations along with special financial appeals.”
“A recent review of the parish financial statements displays a healthy financial picture with the corporation debt free as at September 30, 2000. In addition, the church has reserve funds estimated at $40,000. The church owns a condominium which earns revenue in excess of the costs to maintain the property. This property has an approximate market value of $160,000.”

On September 27, 2001 it was announced by the bishop that I had been appointed the Rector of this parish. However, I did not arrive in Alberta and begin my duties until December 1, 2001.

Just six weeks into my new position I began to learn just how far off that officially endorsed snapshot of the parishes’ financial position was. By January 14, 2002 the Vestry Board was advised that the parish was in a deficit position of $5552.52. At the Annual parish meeting on January 20, 2002 parishioners seemed unsatisfied with the financial reports and asked a lot of questions. Privately some parishioners approached me to express their concerns about the state of the parish’s finances and ask me to inquire about funds raised for mission work outside of the parish went. Over the course of the year a couple of my monthly pay checks bounced. We learned that parishioners had given approximately $4,500 to go to the Primate’s World Relief and Development Fund for work overseas, in the far north and for disaster relief. Unfortunately we also learned that none had been sent and that there was none available to send. The $4,500 had been spent on parish expenses and that there was none left to send to the Primate’s Fund. A respected local business sent the parish a notice that their account was overdue and threatened to cut the church’s credit off.

All of this came to light only because ordinary people in the parish began to ask questions and were not satisfied with the answers they were receiving. Because of this I assembled a parish team that spent a great deal of time sorting through the books and giving us a clear financial snapshot of where the parish stood. The parish had about $20,000 in overdue accounts which included the $4,500 not sent to the Primate’s Fund.

We also learned that the parish had invested about $30,000 and that this investment had lost about $10,000 in value and was now worth only $20,000. I suggested to the parish Vestry that this investment be sold and the funds used to pay off all debts including sending the money donated but not sent to the Primate’s Fund. A courageous and responsible vestry agreed and the church was now prepared to begin again. By the end of 2003 the parish had a positive bank account of approximately $6,000 thanks to parishioners who asked questions and gave generously.

May God give us the courage to ask questions and not settle for answers which just don’t make sense to us. None of us can ignore that we all are responsible for what God has entrusted to our care. Stewardship involves not just giving, it also involves making certain that the gift goes to do the work that God and the giver intended it to do.

Example Three

On May 22 of 2006 I sent a registered letter to the Director of Finance of my Diocese requesting a copy of the 2005 audited financial statements for the Diocese. As of today, March 2, 2007 I am still waiting for those statements to arrive. Surely my request was not an onerous undertaking. The audited statements had to prepared anyway and it would involve the photocopying of approximately 6 pages, placing them in a stamped, addressed envelop and mailing them. As a member of a denomination to which I contributed in excess of $6,000 per year to all of its levels, in addition to helping to raise many thousands of dollars in additional funds to support its ministries and an ever intrusive bureaucracy, I find this method of responding to my request puzzling and frustrating to say the least.

Fortunately, Revenue Canada changed the regulations in 2005 and now any citizen can request the audited financial statements of any of the 80,000+ federally regulated charities. Revenue Canada is to be commended for this act which helps to ensure public accountability for all charities which benefit from using the public taxation system.

In the last section of report I will give you step by step instructions on how to access public information you are entitled to receive if not through the charity you support then through Revenue Canada. However, should your charity prove to be uncooperative or inefficient due to a top heavy bureaucracy then like me you may choose to redirect your charitable dollars to agencies that directly impact people's lives.



Part Three: What Churches can Learn From Others About How to Respect Donors and Their privileged position under Canadian Tax Law


Example One:

The following Donor Bill of Rights was created by the American Association of Fund Raising Counsel, the Association for Healthcare Philanthropy, the Association of Fund Raising Professionals, the Council for the Advancement and Support of Education.

The Donor Bill of Rights

“We declare that all donors have these rights:

To be informed of the organization’s mission, of the way the organization intends to use donated resources, and of its capacity to use donations effectively for their intended purposes.


To be informed of the identity of those serving on the organization’s governing board, and to expect the board to exercise prudent judgment in its stewardship responsibilities.


To have access to the organization’s most recent financial statements.


To be assured their gifts will be used for the purposes for which they were given.


To receive appropriate acknowledgement and recognition.


To be assured that information about their donation is handled with respect and with confidentiality to the extent provided by law.


To expect that all relationships with individuals representing organizations of interest to the donor will be professional in nature.


To be informed whether those seeking donations are volunteers, employees of the organization or hired solicitors.


To have the opportunity for their names to be deleted from mailing lists that an organization may intend to share.


To feel free to ask questions when making a donation and to receive prompt, truthful and forthright answers.

Example Two:



Imagine Canada (a combination of the Canadian Centre for Philanthropy and the Coalition of National Voluntary Organizations) has come up with the following code of conduct:


A. Donor's Rights


All donors (individuals, corporations, and foundations) are entitled to receive an official receipt for income tax purposes for the amount of the donation. Donors of non-monetary eligible gifts (or gifts-in-kind) are entitled to receive an official receipt that reflects the fair market value of the gift. (Note: The term 'Eligible gifts' is comprehensively defined by CRA. A full definition can be found in CRA's Interpretation Bulletin dealing with gifts and official donation receipts.1 Some common gifts, such as donations of volunteer time, services, etc. are not eligible to receive official tax receipts.) The charity's governing board may establish a minimum amount for the automatic issuance of receipts, in which case smaller donations will be receipted only upon request.

All fundraising solicitations by or on behalf of the charity will disclose the charity's name and the purpose for which funds are requested. Printed solicitations (however transmitted) will also include its address or other contact information.
Donors and prospective donors are entitled to the following, promptly upon request:
the charity's most recent annual report and financial statements as approved by the governing board;
the charity's registration number (BN) as assigned by CRA;
any information contained in the public portion of the charity's most recent Charity Information Return (form T3010) as submitted to CRA;
a list of the names of the members of the charity's governing board; and
a copy of this Ethical Fundraising & Financial Accountability Code.
Donors and prospective donors are entitled to know, upon request, whether an individual soliciting funds on behalf of the charity is a volunteer, an employee, or a hired solicitor.
Donors will be encouraged to seek independent advice if the charity has any reason to believe that a proposed gift might significantly affect the donor's financial position, taxable income, or relationship with other family members.
Donors' requests to remain anonymous will be respected.
The privacy of donors will be respected. Any donor records that are maintained by the charity will be kept confidential to the greatest extent possible. Donors have the right to see their own donor record, and to challenge its accuracy.
If the charity exchanges, rents, or otherwise shares its fundraising list with other organizations, a donor's request to be excluded from the list will be honoured.
Donors and prospective donors will be treated with respect. Every effort will be made to honour their requests to:
limit the frequency of solicitations;
not be solicited by telephone or other technology;
receive printed material concerning the charity.
The charity will respond promptly to a complaint by a donor or prospective donor about any matter that is addressed in this Ethical Fundraising & Financial Accountability Code. A designated staff member or volunteer will attempt to satisfy the complainant's concerns in the first instance. A complainant who remains dissatisfied will be informed that he/she may appeal in writing to the charity's governing board or its designate, and will be advised in writing of the disposition of the appeal. A complainant who is still dissatisfied will be informed that he/she may notify Imagine Canada in writing.


B. Fundraising Practices


Fundraising solicitations on behalf of the charity will:
be truthful;
accurately describe the charity's activities and the intended use of donated funds; and
respect the dignity and privacy of those who benefit from the charity's activities.
Volunteers, employees and hired solicitors who solicit or receive funds on behalf of the charity shall:
adhere to the provisions of this Ethical Fundraising & Financial Accountability Code;
act with fairness, integrity, and in accordance with all applicable laws;
adhere to the provisions of applicable professional codes of ethics, standards of practice, etc.
cease solicitation of a prospective donor who identifies the solicitation as harassment or undue pressure;
disclose immediately to the charity any actual or apparent conflict of interest; and
not accept donations for purposes that are inconsistent with the charity's objects or mission.
Paid fundraisers, whether staff or consultants, will be compensated by a salary, retainer or fee, and will not be paid finders' fees, commissions or other payments based on either the number of gifts received or the value of funds raised. Compensation policies for fundraisers, including performance-based compensation practices (such as salary increases or bonuses) will be consistent with the charity's policies and practices that apply to non-fundraising personnel.
The charity will not sell its donor list. If applicable, any rental, exchange or other sharing of the charity's donor list will exclude the names of donors who have so requested (as provided in section A8, above). If a list of the charity's donors is exchanged, rented or otherwise shared with another organization, such sharing will be for a specified period of time and a specified purpose.
The charity's governing board will be informed at least annually of the number, type and disposition of complaints received from donors or prospective donors about matters that are addressed in this Ethical Fundraising & Financial Accountability Code.


C. Financial Accountability


The charity's financial affairs will be conducted in a responsible manner, consistent with the ethical obligations of stewardship and the legal requirements of provincial and federal regulators.
All donations will be used to support the charity's objects, as registered with CRA.
All restricted or designated donations will be used for the purposes for which they are given. If necessary due to program or organizational changes, alternative uses will be discussed where possible with the donor or the donor's legal designate. If the donor is deceased or legally incompetent and the charity is unable to contact a legal designate, the donation will be used in a manner that is as consistent as possible with the donor's original intent.
Annual financial reports will:
be factual and accurate in all material respects;
disclose the total amount of fundraising revenues (receipted and non-receipted)2;
disclose the total amount of fundraising expenses (including salaries and overhead costs)3;
disclose the total amount of donations that are receipted for income tax purposes (excluding bequests, endowed donations that cannot be expended for at least 10 years, and gifts from other charities)4;
disclose the total amount of expenditures on charitable activities (including gifts to other charities)5;
identify government grants and contributions separately from other donations; and
be prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, in all material respects.
No more will be spent on administration and fundraising than is required to ensure effective management and resource development. In any event, the charity will meet or exceed CRA's requirement for expenditures on charitable activities. (The Income Tax Act sets out a requirement that all registered charities spend 80% of their receipted donations from the previous taxation year -- excluding bequests, endowed donations that cannot be expended for at least 10 years, and gifts from other charities -- on charitable activities; in addition, charitable foundations are required to expend 4.5% of their assets in support of charitable programs6)
The cost-effectiveness of the charity's fundraising program will be reviewed regularly by the governing board.

The Anglican Church of Canada and the Anglican Diocese of Toronto are members of Imagine Canada and subscribe to its stricter standards. Likewise they adhere to standards that treat donors respectfully.

I issue a challenge to other charities, especially religious charities who should already adhere to a higher standard to officially adopt Imagine Canada's standards and to register with them. They should also post their audited financial returns on their web sites.

Part Four – Finding the Information You Are Entitled To Have

If you cannot get the information you want from the charity you are investigation or support, don’t despair. The Federal Government has set up a web site to help you. Click on this link and you will be taken directly to that site.

http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/haip/srch/sec/SrchLogin-e;jsessionid=F52JHcn6v4VspbgYpnQ2JqtYsSD9CG6tM2GDmnJ9MTSGt5xlXQwT!-927481160?searchType=Registered

You will be given the option of search four categories:

Canadian Registered Charities
Newly Registered Charities
Recently Revoked Charities
Recent Annulments

Most of us will want to search the first category: Canadian Registered Charities.

You will be asked to insert the name the charity you wish to search. This can be a bit of a challenge. You must enter the current legal name for the charity and not the current operational name or a shortened version of the name.

Next you will be asked to select the charities designation from three choices:


Public Foundation
Private Foundation
Charitable Organization

As I was searching for a church I chose ‘Charitable Organization’.

The next step is to select a code number from a drop down menu. I chose the code 30 for Anglican parishes.

If you know the following information it will make your search go much quicker. Every charity has a Business Number and a Registration Number. If you have any charitable donation receipts in your files these numbers should be listed.

Here are two examples I was interested in viewing. You may wish to use them to practice getting used to the system before finding the particular charity of interest to you.

Example One: The Synod of the Diocese of Calgary
BN/registration number 119229938RR0004


Example Two: St. Michael’s Anglican Church
BN/registration number 119191187RR0001


The form will also show who submitted the return on behalf of the charity.

You may request from this person the audited year end return for the charity from this person. If as in my case that information was not forthcoming then return to the Charities Division of Revenue Canada and they will provide you with the information which you requested. Here is the contact information you will need:

1-800-267-2384 (English) or 1-888-892-5667 (bilingual)




themysticalkurmudgen

faithtowork@yahoo.ca

God"s love is for all creation

God"s love is for all creation
God has many names